Wednesday, 2 December 2015

Step 4 Chapter 1 &3 reflections and and reactions.

Chapter 1
After reading the first paragraph in chapter 1 I was filled with intrigue. The question of what accounting actually is drew me in and started to entice me to continue reading. Having previous experience in Quality Assurance and Accounts and knowing that this is the direction I want my career to go in, identifying exactly what accounting is made me feel excited and eager to continue with this reading. A few more paragraphs in and I began to feel that a lot of things were starting to make sense. The comment about accounting being more like a business model rather than just an activity really began to hit home and ring true.

Continue a little further and all of a sudden I began to get a little frustrated. It appeared that after every defining moment, the next sentence started to change the view on what was just said. For example in one sentence the author states that accounting is about understanding the realities of business, the next sentence he then goes on to change his mind and questions what he just stated ie ”Or is it”. This occurred a few times throughout the reading which became very annoying, I much rather he chose a side and stuck to it.

In saying that I felt that most of the examples used to illustrate his point of view were of a high quality which enabled me to gain a good grasping of some of the key concepts and terms however I feel that at times the author went on and on a little too much. I don’t need to be told about the 100 shops that are located down the main street of Yeppoon or how the keyboard works and was invented or even need to know that he enjoyed playing musical instruments.

The definition of double entry book keeping seemed to lack a little body for my linking. I would have preferred a clearer definition rather than focussing on various publications and telling me all about the Father of Accounting. I mean is this something I really need to know?

As I am an individual who wishes to become involved in book keeping as soon as possible I really enjoyed the topic of book keeping without books. Understanding that networking with bigger firms as a means of ensuring all of the clients needs are met and also ensuring your work is confirmed as being true and correct was really insightful.

Overall I felt defining the relationships between what is accounting, the accounting equation, book keeping, the five elements of accounting and measures of view, changes in value and revenue and expenses was quite practical and to the point. It is this type of presentation of information that I enjoy and wish there was more of.

Chapter 3

After reading chapter 1 and believing there was a lot of unnecessary elements I was a little apprehensive about reading chapter 3. This was of course before I saw the subject title. Once I started to read chapter 3 “Introducing financial statements”, it began with a fantastic definition about how being introduced to financial statement was sort of like meeting two people for the first time. I was able to relate to this which changed my entire mindset. I felt relief come over me. This was a great way to understand this key concept. It was clear, precise and expressed by using real life examples.

Continue reading and it doesn’t take long before the gobbligook creeps back in; “Parent Companies”, what is this all about? Then after the author attempts to explain this to us he proceeds to inform us that we do not need to worry about this now. This just frustrates me once again. My feelings are if we do not need to worry about it then why put it in. This only sets out to confuse me. Once over this initial confusion we are again presented with insightful valuable information with recognisable and valuable information which begins to calm me down.

Then we come to ratios. While I do understand this subject matter, do I really need to know who Euclid or Sir Thomas Little Heath or Alexander Wall is? And why does there need to be a lot of debate among practitioners with regards to the usefulness of financial statements analysis in order to examine profitability, long-term and short term solvency? How is it that we are able to come up with a set curriculum to educate our children but when it comes to predicting the future economic and business outcomes of a business we are all up in the air about how to achieve it? If Warren Buffet, Benjamin Graham and David Dodd are able to make sense of things and get rich from it then why can we not agree to use the same process. It worked for them.


In conclusion after reading this chapter I get the sense that we procrastinate too much and worry more about the why we do things rather than accepting that if it works successful, then we should just use it. 

No comments:

Post a Comment